I am hopeful that this design for a photo ID will someday materialize into a form of currency that I could be satisfied with. But this doesn't mean that something new (like this) will readily be understood by anyone else other than the few CEO's and government personnel who have been educated (strictly on a “need to know” basis) about the premise to this idea. The premise goes something like this...

        House Joint Resolution 192 of the fifth of June 1933 was instituted immediately after Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued an executive order for all federal employees and military personnel to hand in their gold and gold certificates in exchange for Federal Reserve notes. [References] It did not apply to anyone else! HJR 192 is often called “Public Policy”, but this only applies to anyone operating within the domain of our bankrupt Congress, namely as a U.S. Citizen. Since only U.S. persons (citizens = federal employees and military personnel) were ordered to hand in their gold, it stands to good reason that something had to be done in their best interest...not in anyone else's. Hence, privately issued, community and barter based currency, such as privately minted gold and silver medallions is not against Public Policy; it is merely outside the domain of (and the need for) Public Policy. Hence, it is not a felony to trade gold or silver in exchange for goods and services. And it would be a legal contradiction to both conduct barter and/or exchange while at the same time invoking U.S. Citizenship. So, our status temporarily alters the minute we trade a few baseball cards for a stick of chewing gum! We could no longer be a U.S. Citizen for the purposes of that trade, and hence, not come under U.S. authority to federally tax that transaction (provided that those items were never evaluated in U.S. dollars at any time during their existence, including when they were manufactured, sold, and bartered later on)! Public policy makes it a felony for government agents to require U.S. Citizens to “pay their debts”. And in place of payment, U.S. Citizens are given the advantages of “discharge”. But discharge does not reduce the public pool of debt. It adds to it. But “setoff” will reduce the public debt (which is steadily growing larger on a global scale due to our general ignorance). This is where Social Security comes into the historical picture.

        Social Security was set up immediately after Public Policy was put into place as a social insurance policy against our loss and to maintain the illusion (and the ignorance) among the public that we never possessed any public remedy to offset our loss. But “setoff” is a process used by the banking establishment to eliminate the existence of debt. Since all debt created in our society today is “monetized”, i.e. turned into money by being bought, or sold, to someone willing to look forward to the day when he/she may collect on its interest/service charge, as well as the payback of its fictitious principle. This fictional principle was created out of thin air the moment the banker created it in the so-called borrower's bank account. But it's creation steals purchasing power from all other units of monetary value in existence around the globe.

        Setoff is the opposite of fictional money creation. It eleviates public debt. Without setoff, the economy would spiral into hyperinflation and our currency would become worthless. Since most all money in circulation (worldwide) is based on debt (someone owing someone else some credit-value listed on a ledger somewhere), once setoff is used to extinguish a sum certain amount of debt, an equal amount of money is also extinguished. This has the advantage of increasing the value (the purchasing power) of each dollar which is left remaining in circulation. Too many dollars are like too many shares of stock: they dilute their individual value. It is true that setoff has the distinct disadvantage of destroying many jobs associated with its execution. But our economy is predicated on the need for us to remain addicted to debt. So, the loss of jobs is an economically healthy sign that we are reducing the quantity of fictional monetary units in our economy, ergo: we are waking up out of our collective illusion that debt could somehow spell wealth! How absurd! Indeed, debt does represent a growth rate, a growth rate predicated on wagering that the music won't stop playing (that people won't stop engaging in commerce). Or else if it does stop, that somehow one's self will remain unscathed from the consequences.

        A large part of setoff is accomplished via the security interest our federal government has with the collective pool of future payoff that it wagers will emanate from our birth certificate (registered with the Department of Commerce of all places!), either through taxing the living men and women whose names are similar to the names on these accounts, or through various other methods of extraction. Most ledgering for setoff is performed (most likely by the I.R.S.) using our social security number. Social Security is society's security interest under Public Policy; it is an insurance policy of sorts; it is a trust fund which pools all of our securities (gaining interest all of these years) into one massive pooled account divided into individual accounts of ledgering known individually as our social security account. But setoff can also be accomplished without the need for any individual to produce his or her social security name and number (unwittingly every time we're asked to produce our driver license, or other state-issued photo ID). Setoff can also be performed upon the collective pool of all social security accounts held together as a single group-IDentity, or through the use of accounts setup specifically as anonymous holdings to elleviate the unknown status of anyone without an account. Account number 111-11-1111 is one such account. Similarly, the zip code 99999 is also useful as an anonymous location, as well as the phone number of (555) 555-5555.

        So, acceptance for value as a U.S. Citizen is the acceptance of the inherent remedial value to each and every debt by first discharging it (under public policy), and then by (optionally) performing setoff (neutralizing it) via our social security account name and number. Our social security account contains a potential for unlimited commercial liability, any or all of which may be used for setoff. So, rack 'em up baby! Amass all that debt! Well... Maybe, it might be a good idea not to go overboard! What I've done on this currency is add something additional which my photo ID's do not have: a suggested face value for setoff enumerated as “âtoms of account”. But this is only a suggestion, because “unlimited commercial liability” implies just that: an unlimited potential for incurring (and setting off, hence neutralizing) any and all commercial liability to any degree (provided that you can find someone who will be more than willing to execute setoff for any one or another of your various debts!).

        The various denominations of the “MayaShastra” styled-currency is hypothetically predicated (this currency hasn't been produced yet) on the Fibonacci series of numbers, namely: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, et cetera... Notice how each number is the sum of the prior two anywhere in the series: 89 = 55 + 34?

        The use of Fibonacci numbers in fixing the value of each denomination increases the variety of notes which the merchant must keep in his cash register, while at the same time reducing the number of notes in the customer's pocket received whenever the merchant makes change for that customer's purchase. And the count of each denomination which the merchant must keep in his cash drawer is spread out relatively evenly among each denomination, unlike in our current system which favors the use of $1 and $20 notes more often than not. Generally speaking, the most difficult transaction to ever make change for (under any system of denominations) is one in which the customer breaks a large note for a mere $1 purchase. Compare these two versions of the same transaction...

        Customer gives the merchant a $100 note for a $1 purchase. Merchant must give back a minimum of eight notes to make change in this manner: one $50 note, two $20 notes, one $5 note, and four $1 notes. An equivalent exchange using ‘MayaShastra’ currency yields: one $89 note, one $8 note, and one $2 note making a total of three notes in change! The number of notes will never be more than the sixth Fibonacci number back in the series from the value of the “broken note”. Hence, to break a $89 note with a $1 purchase, requires the merchant return to the customer: one $55 note, one $21 note, one $8 note, one $3 note, and one $1 note making a total of five notes in all. The merchant would need to keep multiples of 34 notes of each denomination in his safe in order to cover all purchases up to $89 and have enough variety of notes to handle any possible exchange among his customers (provided that all of his customer's purchases are evenly spread out; most likely, they will not be, but skewed towards smaller purchases). 34 is the second term behind 89. Although the average use of each note will be slightly less than the second term behind the largest note, choosing the second term is simpler for the merchant to decipher and fairly accurate.

        And the dimensions of all the currencies, including the various photo ID's, is a proportional ratio of three to two: the width is three times one-half of the height...similar to a business card. The numbers 3 and 2 form the basic pitch ratio of the perfect fifth in “pure temperament” musical chromatic scales and appear early on within the Fibonacci series.

        And counterfeiting is not a problem, since “why should I care what you do with my setoff (account)?” Setoff equals the reduction of both public and private debt. As Winston Shrout has said, “Maybe you'll put setoff to better use then me!” But judges don't always accept someone else's liability as credit for another man's debts. This places some restriction on this currency's negotiability (transferability). Hence, this currency is a natural outgrowth of the photo ID concept. The photo identifies the maker of the instrument and limits its range of acceptability to cover only the maker's liabilities – not someone else's. So, it functions more like a personal check than as money: a check (a retardation) against debt; a balancing force acting against inflation and the devaluation of our money. But it wouldn't be a loss if some people decided that it was in their best interest to use this currency even if they were at least two hands downstream from its maker...especially if money was in short supply...which, by all indications, is the case these days. But take heart, less money in circulation means gold and silver cost less, too! Oh, well... So! Get out your camera and Adobe PhotoShop and create your own debt-based money!

        The width-to-height ratio of Federal Reserve notes, on the other hand, make use of an approximate ratio derived from the Pell series of numbers (1, 2, 5, 12, 29, 70, ...) which form an altogether different proportional ratio between adjacent members within this series of numbers, namely: 2.414; whereas the Fibonacci series forms the ratio of 1.618. Our planet's salt system of sodium chloride approximates the Fibonacci ratio, but the Pell ratio is geared for other planetary systems' oceanic-blood salts...not our's. The approximate ratio of sodium ammonium sulphate (NaNH₄SO₄), for instance, is found by computing the atomic weight of sulphate divided by the atomic weight of sodium plus ammonium...

        Compare this to sodium chloride...

{under reconstruction...}
See this series of webpages for more background information on the golden and Pell ratios...

        The essential elements of design (for this currency) is that each currency has an affirmation declaring my willingness to setoff the bankruptcy of the United States through the grace of Guru Dev:

Any offer to: {One} expand funds of the people, by {Two} presuming to attach collective karma to the Monad, is accepted for its remedial value on behalf of the Atma and pursuant to natural law as consideration for the benevolence of the people. I, the Monad, with full accord and satisfaction acting as agent for the Atma, and by affirmation of unlimited natural liability, delegate limited power of attorney-in-fact to: {One} setoff the collective karma of the people via the grace of the Atma – the Eternal Self, and {Two} zero all accounts with prejudice.

        And furthermore, that each currency declare in large, and/or bold, font...

• Acceptance for Value through the grace of the Atma – the Eternal Self

        The inclusion of additional pieces of information are optional, but could be helpful, namely...

• Unlimited Commercial Liability (or something similar; I choose to use the phrase Innumerable Âtoms of Commercial Liability, since the dollar is undefined: there is no definition of its individual worth fixed by current federal law)
• [brand name of the currency; I use the phrase: Aum MayaShastra Aum written in Sanskrit Devanagari characters]
• [website for referring people to read more about the currency; mine is: MayaShastra.org]
• [the atomic amount of the note (slightly faded as a watermark effect)]
• [the atomic amount of the note spelled out in plain English, such as: Twenty-One Âtoms... — this is NOT âtoms/money of exchange, for that would require it to be backed with substance, i.e. gold or silver for example, or else backed by a performance of labor (either a promise to do something in the future, or else a declaration of having labored sometime in the past similar to Ithaca Hours)]
• [identifying photograph of the creditor of the note; I choose to use a photograph of shri guru dev; “You say that photo doesn't look like me? Yet by what authority do you make that determination? Your own, or did someone give you power of attorney?”]
• [a great seal of your own design; mine says AMERICA surrounding a circular outer whorl of six 3-spoked wheels pointing inwards suggesting a six-pointed star-shaped flower, and an inner set of six angle marks pointing outwards suggesting the vague outline of a hexagonal figure]

“Mr. Chairman, if a Scottish distiller wishes to send a cargo of Scotch whiskey to these United States, he can draw his bill against the purchasing bootlegger in dollars and after the bootlegger has accepted it by writing his name across the face of it, the Scotch distiller can send that bill to the nefarious open discount market in New York City where the Fed will buy it and use it as collateral for a new issue of Fed Notes. Thus the Government of these United States pay the Scotch distiller for the whiskey before it is shipped, and if it is lost on the way, or if the Coast Guard seizes it and destroys it, the Fed simply write off the loss and the government never recovers the money that was paid to the Scotch distiller.

“While we are attempting to enforce prohibition here, the Fed are in the distillery business in Europe and paying bootlegger bills with public credit of these United States. “Mr. Chairman, by the same process, they compel our Government to pay the German brewer for his beer. Why should the Fed be permitted to finance the brewing industry in Germany either in this way or as they do by compelling small and fearful United States Banks to take stock in the Isenbeck Brewery and in the German Bank for brewing industries? “Mr. Chairman, if Dynamit Nobel of Germany, wishes to sell dynamite in Japan to use in Manchuria or elsewhere, it can drew its bill against the Japanese customers in dollars and send that bill to the nefarious open discount market in New York City where the Fed will buy it and use it as collateral for a new issue of Fed Notes- while at the same time the Fed will be helping Dynamit Nobel by stuffing its stock into the United States banking system.

“Why should we send our representatives to the disarmament conference at Geneva- while the Fed is making our Government pay Japanese debts to German Munitions makers?

“Mr. Chairman, if a German wishes to raise a crop of beans and sell them to a Japanese customer, he can draw a bill against his prospective Japanese customer in dollars and have it purchased by the Fed and get the money out of this Country at the expense of the American people before he has even planted the beans in the ground. “Mr. Chairman, if a German in Germany wishes to export goods to South America, or any other Country, he can draw his bill against his customers and send it to these United States and get the money out of this Country before he ships, or even manufactures the goods.

“Mr. Chairman, why should the currency of these United States be issued on the strength of German Beer? Why should it be issued on the crop of unplanted beans to be grown in Chili for Japanese consumption? Why should these United States be compelled to issue many billions of dollars every year to pay the debts of one foreigner to another foreigner? "Was it for this that our National Bank depositors had their money taken out of our banks and shipped abroad? Was it for this that they had to lose it? Why should the public credit of these United States and likewise money belonging to our National Bank depositors be used to support foreign brewers, narcotic drug vendors, whiskey distillers, wig makes, human hair merchants, Chilean bean growers, to finance the munition factories of Germany and Soviet Russia?”

From: “Dr. Sam Kennedy” {TAKE NO PRISONERS}
To: {email recipients}
Subject: {...} A GIFT FROM SAM
{this snippet of his email was edited by myself to include more links}
Date: Sunday, November 30, 2008 8:45 AM

A GIFT

For the benefit of beginners and experienced law merchants alike, I offer you the brief READING LIST AT THE END OF THIS EMAIL, carefully selected, concisely summarized below, hot-linked for convenience (won't work in all browsers), as an essential resource for beginners, for educating friends and family, for experienced law merchants who need a refresher, AND TO ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENTS IN ACQUIRING FACTUAL KNOWLEDGE FROM GENUINE U.S. RECORDS ABOUT THEIR ROLES IN THE CONFISCATION OF THEIR OWN CHILDREN'S WEALTH, BY THE MEN BEHIND THE SCENES WHO HAVE PULLED THE STRINGS ALL OF YOUR LIFE. Thirty minutes is all it will take to learn the truth from the horse's mouth.

_________________

Inside the box. Outside the box. Your remedies abound as he intended.

“And the grace of our Lord was exceedingly abundant with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus” (1 Timodhy 1:14).

Thank you for reading. If you have no objection, would you kindly forward this email, intact and with the reading list, to all of the friends and family on your list? In this time of crisis, when they are gripped by fear and finally catching glimpses of the truth, a few moments reading the brilliant speeches of Congressman Louis McFadden's should open their eyes.

God bless,
Sam

__________________________
Dr. Sam Kennedy
The Save America Crusade
FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY - NOT LEGAL ADVICE.
PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS. MOST PROBLEMS ARE SELF-CREATED.

* BIC = Beneficiaries-in-common

ESSENTIAL REFERENCES (can be reviewed in less than 30 minutes).
Please Goggle or use the included links:

“28 USC 3002”

Definition of the United States as a Federal corporation never taught in civics class; go to paragraph 15:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00003002----000-.html

“27 CFR 72.11”

U.S. Inc. defines all crime as commercial as a result of the fall of the republic when the South walked out of congress in 1861 and the de jure congress, unable to raise a quorum, was replaced by Lincoln with the de facto corporate Congress; and the de jure district court of the United States was replaced by the de facto corporate UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.

http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_98/27cfr72_98.html

“Executive Order 6102”

Government's confiscation of your family's gold and wealth under threat of 10 years in prison for failure to comply. As the Order specifies U.S. “persons” (eg. JOHN SMITH and JANE DOE), law enforcement was duped into enforcing against the general public a command that only applied to Federal employees and members of the armed forces.

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=14611

http://www.the-privateer.com/1933-gold-confiscation.html

“HJR 192”

Outlawing of the simple act of “paying obligations” as a felony by substituting the lawyer's parlor trick of “discharging” debts.

http://www.truthsetsusfree.com/HJR192.htm

http://www.nomoredebt.cc/hjr192.html

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/house-joint-resolution-192.pdf

“Agricultural Adjustment Act” {National Economic Emergency Act} Voided by United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1 (1936)

HJR 192 amended the last paragraph of the Agricultural Adjustment Act. The Agricultural Adjustment Act was subsequently found to be void and unconstitutional forever putting into the question the wisdom and validity of HJR 192.

http://laws.findlaw.com/us/297/1.html

“HJR 192” and the “Agricultural Adjustment Act” Repealed

Reversing the prior act of “discharging” our debts by repealing HJR 192 and the Agricultural Adjustment Act which it amended.

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/HJR-192_repealed.pdf

“Lawful Dollars” Repealed

The repeal of ‘lawful dollars’: 31 U.S.C. &sec; 314 – the standard unit value as “the dollar consisting of 24 8/10 grains of gold, nine tenths fine and/or 371.25 grains of .999 fine silver as established shall be the standard unit of value, and all forms of money issued and coined by the United States shall be maintained at a parity of the value with this standard, and it shall be the duty of the Secretary of the Treasury to maintain such parity”.

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/31T.txt

“Lawful Money” Repealed

The repeal of ‘lawful money’: 12 U.S.C. &sec; 152 – “The terms ‘lawful money’ and ‘lawful money of the United States’ shall be construed to mean gold and silver coin of the United States”.

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/12C2.txt

“Acceptance for Value”

What does Acceptance for Value Mean?

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/a4v.pdf

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/Accepted_For-As_Value.htm

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/accepted_as_value_info.pdf

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/A4V_-_next_steps.pdf

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/UCC_course_4_-_Redemption_Birth_Certificate_Chargeback.pdf

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/The_Birth_Certificate.pdf

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/section_666_social_security_mark_number_beast_-_Google_Search.htm

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/

“Why do government officials ignore our remedies?”

ANSWER: Because they merely provide an insurance policy of their design. Anyone choosing to remain within the boundaries of their insurance policy, is considered an insurgent, and a rebel, requiring their oversight. Anyone electing to remain outside of their protection is considered a foreigner who is open to confiscation of property and person, as well as extortion and other forms of commercial conflict (liens, imprisonment, et cetera).

WARNING: The file below makes mention of ‘conditional acceptance’ for value. This is a mistake. All of our acceptances need to be constructed as unconditional. Think about it, thoroughly.

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/update-on-discharge-of-debt-12-18-06.pdf

“Congressman Louis McFadden speech”

Indictment of the Secretary of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board of Governor's for treason by the chairman of the House Banking and Currency committee in 1934. In scathing speeches to Congress, McFadden said: “(The Fed) has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government.” This most knowledgeable man on banking also explained in vivid detail the method for recruiting the Federal Reserve to pay our debts as holder of the gold, and which is at the heart of today's “tax remedies.”

http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/mcfadden-frb.html

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/3616/flaherty10.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_T._McFadden

“Lewis v. United States 680”

Federal Reserve Bank is privately owned: “...we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the FTCA (Federal Tort Claims Act), but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.” Lewis v. United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9^th Cir. 1982). In other words, the Fed enjoys no United States immunity from law suit because it is a Federal institution in name only.

http://nesara.org/court_summaries/lewis_v_united_states.htm

http://www.geocities.com/chrisforliberty/lewis.html

“Modern Money Mechanics”

The Fed's concise operational manual showing how money AND INTENTIONAL INFLATION are created from thin air by the Fed and it's member banks. The manual is very clear as to the power of created inflation to speed the process of confiscating your wealth. The section: “Who Creates Money?” and the final paragraph in “Bank Deposits – How They Expand or Contract” are worth extra attention.

http://www.truthsetsusfree.com/ModernMoneyMechanics.pdf

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/Modern+Money+Mechanic.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDun7uNo138 (part one)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UFZfvLeQ5Y (part two)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WG6r8PUBCzc (part three)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-LbJa3h55A (part four)

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/Money+Matrix+Dialup.wmv (all four parts)

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/Banking+Basics.pdf

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/Points+of+Interest.pdf

http://vinyasi-public-records.info/data/Credit+Slide+Show+-+Short.pdf

“Grace Commission”

Confirmed that virtually ALL taxes actually go to the Federal Reserve Bank to pay interest on the U.S. debt to the banking families that own the International Monetary Fund (IMF): “With two-thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government.” – J. Peter Grace, Cover letter, President's Private Sector Report on Cost Control, January 12, 1984. Peter Grace was considered the Warren Buffett of his time, and the Grace Commission Report received widespread media attention as the gospel of Reagan's so-called tax system overhaul.

http://www.freecanadian.net/articles/grace.html

http://www.uhuh.com/taxstuff/gracecom.htm

INDEX TO RECENT TOPICS (2008 mostly) - TAKE NO PRISONERS

- Repelling attorneys   (July 6, 2008, July 13, 2008, Aug. 17, 2008, Oct. 12, 
	2008)
- Contract disputes -- settling (Jan 13, 2008, Jan. 20, 2008, Feb. 24, 2008)
- Rescinding testimony -- grand jury or other (Nov. 30, 2008)
- Return of process letter  (Nov. 9, 2008)
- Returning process -- 3 methods without entering the Bar  (Nov. 9, 2008)
- Returning process orally by tribal attorney  (Nov. 9, 2008)
- Returning process orally with prayer outside the Bar  (Nov. 9, 2008)
- Returning process after having appeared  (Nov. 30, 2008)
- Returning subpoenas, summonses and complaints  (Oct 19, 2008, Nov. 23, 2008)
- Subpoenas - six ways to handle   (Oct. 19, 2008)
- Subpoenas    (Dec 8, 2007)
- Summons -- handling (June 1, 2008 (part 1), June 22, 2008 (part 2))
- Complaint -- handling (June 1, 2008)
- Records - affidavit denying existence  (July 13, 2008)
- Investigation -- handling (Aug. 24, 2008)
- Arraignment - handling  (Oct. 19, 2008, Oct. 26, 2008)
- Indictment  (Dec. 16, 2007)
- Arrest -- treatise on handling  (August 10, 2008)
- Grand jury hearing - handling   (Oct. 19, 2008)
- Court hearing -- handling (Aug. 31, 2008)
- IRS hearing (July 13, 2008)
- FBI interview -- handling (June 8, 2008)
- Trial -- interview with Tom Schaults (Aug 24, 2008, Aug. 31, 2008)
- Appear or not?  (Nov. 23, 2008)
- Rejecting dismissal of the counterclaim  (Nov. 30, 2008)
- Denial of a corporation  (Aug. 10, 2008)
- Deconstructing the De facto Courtroom  (June 30, July 20, 2008, July 27, 
	2008, Aug. 31, 2008, Sept. 7, 2008, Sept. 14, 2008, Oct. 5, 2008)
- Basic courtroom procedure  (Sept. 7, 2008, Oct. 5, 2008)
- Courtroom procedure  (June 30, July 20, 2008, July 27, 2008, Aug. 31, 2008, 
	Sept. 7, 2008, Sept. 14, 2008, Oct. 5, 2008)
- Making the record  (Oct. 5, 2008)
- Probation -- a primer  (Dec. 30, 2007)
- Sentencing  (Dec. 30, 2007)
- Reporting to prison  (Dec. 30, 2007)
- Repelling arrest for failure to appear  (Dec. 8, 2007)
- Repelling prison sentence  (Dec. 8, 2007)
- Prison extraction  (Nov. 10, 2007, Dec 15, 2007, Dec. 16, 2007)
- Names - handling the name issue  (Sept. 14, 2008)
- Special sovereign victory  (Jan 13, 2008, Jan 20, 2008)


- Basic UCC Redemption process, Part 1  (Dec. 7, 2008)
- Seals  (Nov. 30, 2008, Dec. 7, 2008)
- Instant Affidavit    (Oct. 5, 2008)
- Basic UCC process for zeroing and funding account  (Dec. 7, 2008)
- BC Bond for funding account  (Dec. 7, 2008)
- Fidelity bond -- debunking the myth (Aug. 31, 2008)
- Criminal Code of Canada   (Sept. .28, 2008, Oct. 5, 2008)
- Perils of drafting Treasury -- a caution (Dec. 22, 2007)


- Enforcement (Sept. 22, 2007, Sept. 23, 2007, June 1, 2008, July 20, 2008, 
	Sept. .28, 2008, Oct. 5, 2008)
- Enforcement with 18 USC 2071, 75 and 76  (Nov. 30, 2008)
- Enforcment with BIC -- comprehensive approach  (Sept. 22, 2007, Sept. 23, 
	2007)
- Enforcement (comprehensive) -- with letter form the Queen  (Nov. 30, 2008)
- Enforcement with liens  (Apr. 13, 2008)
- Counterclaim  (Nov 11, 2007)
- Arresting a bond  (June 1, 2008)
- Arresting successor surety -- a lien against title  (Dec. 8, 2007, Dec. 9, 
	2007, Dec. 15, 2007, Dec. 16, 2007)
- Dunn & Bradstreet  (Apr. 13, 2008)
- Notary for enforcement   (Sept. 2, 2007, Sept. 9, 2007, Sept. 29, 2007)
- Trial by notary (Sept. 9, 2007)
- Commercial liens  (Apr. 13, 2008)
- Criminal complaints  (Dec. 8, 2007), Apr. 13, 2008)
- Drowning in public policy  (Feb. 24, 2008)
- Power of Attorney (self-executing)   (Oct. 19, 2008)
- Bankruptcy Court, delaying foreclosure, enforcing liens (Nov. 3, 2007, Nov. 
	10, 2007, Nov. 11, 2007, Feb. 24, 2008)
- Issuing subpoenas  (Dec 8, 2007)


- BIC (Sept. 22, 2007, Sept. 23, 2007, Dec. 15, 2007, Dec. 16, 2007, Jan. 6, 
	2008, Jan 13, 2008, Feb. 10, 2008, Feb 17, 2008, Feb. 24, 2008, May 
	25, 2008, June 1, 2008, June 8, 2008, June 22, 2008, June 30, 2008, 
	Aug. 17, 2008, Aug. 24, 2008)
- BIC overview  (Dec. 16, 2007)
- BIC and probation -- a primer  (Dec. 30, 2007)
- BIC safety modification  (Aug.17, 2008, Aug. 24, 2008)
- BIC Turbo -- Canadian version outtake (Oct. 26, 2008)
- BIC turbo v. Turbo 9 and Turbo 8.3  (June 8, 2008)
- BIC Self-executing Power of Attorney   (Oct. 19, 2008)
- BIC Comprehensive Administrative Remedy  (Dec. 16, 2007)
- BIC Global Privacy Shield  (Oct. 12, 2008)
- BIC Fundamentals (May 25, 2008)
- BIC offset bond  (Nov. 4, 2007)
- Early and other introductory BIC  topics can be found in the months prior to 
	September 2007 not included in this list.
- Attorney Repellant Package for those facing threats of a civil lawsuit (July 
	6, 2008 (Part 1), July 13, 2008 (Part 2), Aug. 17, 2008, Oct. 12, 2008) 
- Contract Dispute Settlement Package -- settling (Jan 13, 2008, Jan. 20, 2008, 
	Feb. 24, 2008)
- BIC Rescission Package  (Dec 8, 2007)
- Notary process  (June 8, 2008)
- Notaries - protecting the notary (Dec. 22, 2007, March 9, 2008, Aug. 17, 
	2008, Aug. 24, 2008)
- Notary under attack  (Dec. 22, 2007)
- Notary as non-participant  (Aug 24, 2008)
- Trial by Notary - Assembling a notary tribunal to issue and defend subpoenas


- Capitalization -- the actual Biblical derivation for (Dec. 7, 2008)
- Solemn affirmations v. affidavits -- Biblical derivation for affirmations  
	(Dec. 7, 2008)
- Biblical rationale for Redemption process (Dec. 7, 2008)
- Punctuation in names  (Dec. 7, 2008)
- Commercial philosophy  (August 10, 2008)
- Creditor philosophy (Dec. 16, 2007, April 27, 2007)
- Mentoring  (Mar. 2, 2008)
- Mentoring Corps  (Mar. 2, 2008)
- Fear  (Dec. 22, 2007, March 9, 2008, Aug. 10, 2008, Aug. 17, 2008)
- Safety (Aug.17, 2008, Aug. 24, 2008)


- HJR 192  (Nov. 23, 2008)
- Public Law 73-10  (Nov. 23, 2008)
- Public Law Statutes-at-large, 48 Chap 48, Stat. 112  (Nov. 23, 2008)


- Abatement  (June 1, 2008, Nov. 23, 2008)
- Abatement -- returning process orally with prayer outside the Bar  (Nov. 9, 
	2008)


- Tom Schaults interview  (June 30, 2008, July 20, 2008, July 27, 2008, Aug. 
	24, 2008, Aug. 31, 2008)
- McFadden Remedy (Nov. 30, 2008)
- Congressman Louis McFadden (Nov. 30, 2008)
- Elaine Brown -- Commentary on purported use of a 1099 (August 10, 2008


- Sponsoring the credit -- the philosophy of tax remedies   (Dec. 16, 2007, 
	April 27, 2008)
- OID method (Jan. 6, 2008, Jan. 13, 2008, , April 27, 2008, May 4, 2008, May 
	4, 2008, May 11, 2008, May 18, 2008, June 8, 2008, Oct. 26, 2008, Nov. 
	16, 2008)
- Tax remedies -- conclusions of ZYA v "A" method  (Nov. 16, 2008)
- ZYA  (June 8, 2008, Nov. 16, 2008)
- "A" method intro  (April 27, 2008)
- 1099 process - to use or not  (Nov. 16, 2008)
- 1099 process - misuse of Form 1096 with likely prosecutions  (Oct. 26, 2008, 
	Nov. 16, 2008)
- 1099 process - 6 levels of safety in court cases  (Oct. 26, 2008)

Folks, most any of those topics can be a remedy for men and women who treat 
	them as acorns to be researched and developed as part of a comprehen-
	sive program of spiritual growth and learning.  The list was compiled 
	from broadcast summaries, so my apologies for the many other topics not 
	mentioned in the summaries which are not included in the list, and for 
	any errors or typos.

CAUTION: Please be aware of my tendency to create "technology" on the fly as 
	needed.  Which means that some topics are seasoned and some are fresh 
	off the drawing board.   So please be cautious in YOUR decisions, and 
	when handling emails that seek to use fear to suppress the free flow of 
	information that made all this information possible.  If we had heeded 
	the call for quiet suffering instead of public exchange of ideas, none 
	of these topics would ever have been brought forth.

-------------
God bless,
Sam (Kennedy)

MayaShastra

The Science of Creative Intelligence. You won't find this entry in any dictionary or alluded to by any scholar. The phrase “Creative Intelligence” for the translation of ‘maya’ is my own inner revelation, while the term “Science” for the translation of ‘Shastra’ is my best guess derived from the lectures of Charlie Lutes when he referred to “Brahma Shastra” as being the ‘Science of the Creator’ and that all of our science emanates from same.

An alternate and more strict translation would be: The Sword of Illusion, i.e. the phallus – or linga – of shiva (shivalinga). Lord Shiva is the Great Liberator, for He is the death of Death itself, the vanquisher of Lord Yama, by taking the Self-Realized Yogi off of the wheel of necessity: the wheel of reincarnation and its binding influence of karma. So, Shiva's sword cuts the unadjudicated karma of the ascended yogi out of that yogi's personal liability (darshan) permitting that individual's consciousness to step safely aside from the mind/body at the time of its death and be personally untouched by same.

...Let's take this a step further...

The Mark of the Beast: ‘linga’ is a mark. And ‘sword’ is used by Shakespeare to refer to ‘penis’, as in: “sheath thy dagger”, ergo, “zip up your fly...your penis is showing”! Of course, ‘beast’ is the animal nature within man / woman / child. And the repressed sex-urge (repressed, i.e. covered up / prudery) is used to further the goals of commercializing everything we do by taking those repressed urges and venting them into the conditioned training and brainwashing that we all receive through the media to buy and sell stuff which we don't even need: impulse buying, and impassioned buying and window-shopping sprees. Thus, nudity undermines Public Policy's outreach program which is to prop up the fictitious value of the dollar by our inordinate use of the dollar in commerce. But this is the wrong use of nudity. As a nudist, I feel that the sexual urges should not be repressed; they should be expressed in a humane manner, such as during naked exercise; what the ancient Greeks would call: gymnazein (naked exercise / training), and that this peaceful, humane use of the sexual urge within mankind prevents the use and misuse of these urges in otherwise unhealthy activities, such as the over-blown importance which commercialism holds in our lives. Notice that it is the nearly naked individual which stimulates the desire for more desire, not the fully naked non-sexualized human being at peace with itself. Thus, the penis and vulva are the key. Cover them up, and you have a wild beast on your hands ready to spend those pent up urges in whatever manner of conditioned reflex which we have been socially engineered to behave in. But uncover them, and you and I are free to dispassionately enjoy life without being leashed to the State and its monopoly on: the media, common (non-)sense, and our public (conditioning) schools, et cetera. Thus, dispassionate nudity is symbolic of the future of mankind's commercial life: a life free from State-authorized micro-management. So, although this currency makes use of our ‘beastly mark’ (our social security account name and number), it also makes use of our other ‘beastly mark’: our dispassionately, fully naked genitalia as our direct line of unlimited commercial credit and credibility. This nudist symbology (hell-bent on displaying ourselves fully) is inclusive of elements from both the old school of thought which states that: “humans are too dumb (like sheep) and need Big Brother to manage their every affair”, along with the new school of thought which states that: “man does not live by (the buying and selling of) bread alone”, he lives by the peace found within himself. So, get out that ‘dick’ of your's and take charge of your life! Meditate and act; rest before activity. Improve the quality of your rest, and you'll improve the quality of the rest of your life: your activity will flourish (as it naturally should) in whatever manner which is right for you, alone.

— gymnazein: 1598, “place of exercise,” from L. gymnasium “school for gymnastics,” from Gk. gymnasion, from gymnazein “to exercise or train,” lit. “to train naked,” from gymnos “naked.” Shortened form gym is attested from 1871. Introduced to Ger. 15c. as a name for “high school,” in Eng. it has remained purely athletic. Gymnast (1594) in the modern sense is a back-formation of gymnastic, (1574) from Gk. gynmastikos “pertaining to or skilled in bodily exercise.”

maya

Maya brings the illusory solidity of manifestation into reality.

f. art, wisdom, extraordinary or supernatural power (only in the earlier language);

illusion, unreality, deception, fraud, trick, sorcery, witchcraft magic RV. &c. &c.;

an unreal or illusory image, phantom, apparition ib. (esp. ibc=false, unreal, illusory; cf. comp.);

duplicity (with Buddhists one of the 24 minor evil passions) Dharmas. 69 (in phil.) Illusion (identified in the Samkhya with Prakriti or Pradhana and in that system, as well as in the Vedanta, regarded as the source of the visible universe) IW. 83;

108;

(with Saivas) one of the 4 Pasas or snares which entangle the soul Sarvad. MW.;

(with Vaishnavas) one of the 9 Saktis or energies of Vishnu L.;

Illusion personified (sometimes identified with Durga, sometimes regarded as a daughter of Anrita and Nirriti or Nikriti and mother of Mrityu, or as a daughter of Adharma) Pur.;

compassion, sympathy L.;

Convolvulus Turpethum L.;

N. of the mother of Gautama Buddha MWB. 24;

of Lakshmi W.;

of a city Cat.;

of 2 metres Col.;

du. (maayeindrasya) N. of 2 Samans ArshBr.

{to properly understand maya, one must also understand its inverse: yama}

yama

Yama takes our illusory world out of manifestation.

m. a rein , curb, bridle RV. v, 61, 2;

a driver, charioteer ib. viii, 103, to;

the act of checking or curbing, suppression, restraint (with vaachaam, restraint of words, silence) BhP.;

self-control forbearance, any great moral rule or duty (as opp. to niyama, a minor observance; in Yajn. iii, 313 ten Yamas are mentioned, sometimes only five) Mn. MBh. &c.;

(in Yoga) self-restraint (as the first of the eight Angas or means of attaining mental concentration) IW. 93;

any rule or observance ParGr.;

(yama) mf(A or I)n. twin-born, twin, forming a pair RV. &c. &c.;

m. a twin, one of a pair or couple, a fellow (du. ‘the twins’ N. of the Ashvins and of their twin children by Maadrii, called Nakula and Saha-deva; yamau mithunau, twins of different sex) ib.;

a symbolical N. for the number ‘two’ Hcat.;

N. of the god who presides over the Pitris (q.v.) and rules the spirits of the dead RV. &c. &c. IW. 18;

197, 198 &c. RTL. 10;

16;

289 &c. (he is regarded as the first of men and born from Vivasvat, ‘the Sun’, and his wife Saranyu;

while his brother, the seventh Manu, another form of the first man, is the son of Vivasvat and Samjna, the image of Saranyu;

his twin-sister is Yami, with whom he resists sexual alliance, but by whom he is mourned after his death, so that the gods, to make her forget her sorrow, create night;

in the Veda he is called a king or samgamano jananam, ‘the gatherer of men’, and rules over the departed fathers in heaven, the road to which is guarded by two broad-nosed, four-eyed, spotted dogs, the children of Sharama q.v.;

in Post-vedic mythology he is the appointed Judge and ‘Restrainer’ or ‘Punisher’ of the dead, in which capacity he is also called dharma-raja or dharma and corresponds to the Greek Pluto and to Minos;

his abode is in some region of the lower world called Yama-pura;

thither a soul when it leaves the body, is said to repair, and there, after the recorder, Citra-gupta, has read an account of its actions kept in a book called Agra-samdhana, it receives a just sentence;

in MBh. Yama is described as dressed in blood-red garments, with a glittering form, a crown on his head, glowing eyes and like Varuna, holding a noose, with which he binds the spirit after drawing it from the body, in size about the measure of a man's thumb;

he is otherwise represented as grim in aspect, green in colour, clothed in red, riding on a buffalo, and holding a club in one hand and noose in the other;

in the later mythology he is always represented as a terrible deity inflicting tortures, called yatana, on departed spirits [846,2];

he is also one of the 8 guardians of the world as regent of the South quarter;

he is the regent of the Nakshatra Apa-bharani or Bharani, the supposed author of RV. x, 10;

14, of a hymn to Vishnu and of a law-book;

yamasyarkah, N. of a Saman ArshBr.);

N. of the planet Saturn (regarded as the son of Vivasvat and Chaya) Hariv. BhP.;

of one of Skanda's attendants (mentioned together with Ati-yama) MBh.;

a crow L. (cf. -dutaka);

a bad horse (whose limbs are either too small or too large) L.;

(I) f. N. of Yama's twin-sister (who is identified in Postvedic mythology with the river-goddess Yamuna) RV. &c. &c.;

n. a pair, brace, couple L.;

(in gram.) a twin-letter (the consonant interposed and generally understood, but not written in practice, between a nasal immediately preceded by one of the four other consonants in each class) Pra1t. Pat. on Pa1n2. 1-1, 8;

pitch of the voice, tone of utterance, key Pra1t.

1. shastra

1 n. (for 2. see under shas) invocation, praise (applied to any hymn recited either audibly or inaudibly, as opp. to stoma, which is sung, but esp. the verses recited by the Hotri and his assistant as an accompaniment to the Grahas at the Soma libation) VS. Br. ShrS. ChUp.;

reciting, recitation ShankhBr.

2. shastra (more...)

2 m. (for 1. see p. 1044 , col. 1) a sword L.;

(I) f. see below;

n. an instrument for cutting or wounding, knife, sword, dagger, any weapon (even applied to an arrow Bhat2t2.; weapons are said to be of four kinds, pani-mukta, yantra-mukta, muktomukta, and amukta) S3Br. &c. &c.;

any instrument or tool (see comp.);

iron, steel L.;

a razor L.

1. shas, shasa

mfn. reciting (see uktha-shas, -shasa).

2. shas

1 cl. 1. P. (Dhatup. xvii, 78) shasati (Ved. also -shasti and -shaasti; pf. shashaasa MBh.; 3. pl. shashasuh Gr.; fut. shasitaa ib.; shasishyati Br.; Ved. inf. -shasas Br.; ind. p. -shasya MBh.), to cut down, kill, slaughter (mostly vi-shas q.v.)

3. shas

2 see ‘sas’.

4. shas

3 (in gram.) the technical case-termination of the accusative plural Pa1n2. 4-1, 2;

the Taddhita affix shas (forming adverbs from nouns, esp. from numerals and words expressive of quantity) ib. v, 1, 42 &c. (cf. alpa-shas, bahu-shas, shata-shas &c.)

sas

cl. 2. P. (Dhatup. xxiv, 70) sasti (in TS. also sasaasti and in VS. sa-sasti, pr. p. sasat RV. AV.; Gr. also pf. sasaasa aor. asaasiit; fut. sasitaa, sasishyati), to sleep RV. &c. (cf. above) Naigh. iii, 22;

to be inactive or idle RV.: Caus. saasayati aor. asiishasat), Gr.: Desid. sisasishati ib.: Intens. saasasyate, sasasti ib.